Thursday, 21 November 2002 - 10:30 AM
Hotel Nikko Golden Gate (150)

POLI-326. Building Political Power in the Tobacco Control Movement

Jack M. Nicholl, MA, Center for Policy and Organizing, American Lung Association of California, jnicholl@verizon.net, Chuck Hamsher, American Heart Association, Ohio Valley Affiliate, chuck.hamsher@heart.org, Beverly J. May, BS MPA, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, bmay@tobaccofreekids.org, Chris Sherwin, Colorado Tobacco Education and Prevention Alliance, chris@ctepa.org.

Learning Objectives: Demonstrate how with effective, high energy community organizing, the tobacco prevention movement can beat more powerful opposition forces at their own political game. Describe how coalitions composed of powerful organizations outside the tobacco control community can often achieve tobacco control objectives that are beyond the reach of traditional tobacco prevention coalitions. Explain how with limited resources, tobacco prevention organizations can recruit and maintain thousands of active policy advocates throghout the state.

Abstract: This panel will assist those involved in policy advocacy and enforcement strategies to plan and execute winning campaigns. Advocacy, communications and coalition staff plus volunteer campaign leaders should attend. Coalitions with ambitious policy change agendas, and those who have suffered defeats and want to taste victory will also benefit.

Three campaigns – a tobacco tax increase in Utah, protecting MSA allocations for tobacco prevention in Colorado and defeating a MSA securitization proposal in West Virginia – will demonstrate the power of community organizing strategies within the tobacco prevention movement.

Diversifying the coalition and the campaign message beyond the scope of tobacco control is central to all three victories. In Utah, an innovative strategy of recruiting advocates in rural communities and supporting them with face-to-face contact by local PTA leaders shifted attitudes among rural legislators towards the tax. In Colorado, educating women’s and related health groups about the impact of tobacco use on women’s health, led to a women’s health coalition opposing the Governor’s raid on the state’s tobacco prevention program to fund cancer treatment for indigent women. In West Virginia, the coalition recruited 15 major health groups with active memberships who were not involved in tobacco issues to oppose the Governor’s securitization plan. The intense grassroots lobbying campaign focused on healthcare, but also protected the state’s tobacco prevention program.

Panelists will assist the audience in applying the winning strategies by detailing the composition of the non-traditional coalitions which wielded so much influence, and the innovative grassroots mobilization techniques.


NCTOH Final.ppt (0.0 kb)

Back to Building Political Power in the Tobacco Control Movement
Back to Public Policy and Advocacy Strategies
Back to The 2002 National Conference on Tobacco or Health