Learning Objectives: Discuss the constitutional and public health arguments concerning the imposition of smoking restrictions in correctional facilities.
Abstract: Inmates are a sub-population uniquely impacted by environmental tobacco smoke yet have been gravely overlooked by tobacco control advocates. The constitutional and public health arguments for implementing smoking bans/restrictions in correctional facilities differ from those made in the general population because of the close confines and poor ventilation in these facilities. Inmates have been successful at obtaining compensation for second-hand smoke related health effects through the legal system as well as in protesting imposed smoking bans. Public health officials must balance the responsibility of protecting inmates from health hazards while not infringing upon their constitutional rights.
This presentation will rely on a review of the legal material and a summary of States’ efforts to impose smoking restrictions and bans in correctional facilities.
Back to Poster Session
Back to Public Policy and Advocacy Strategies
Back to The 2002 National Conference on Tobacco or Health