Wednesday, 20 November 2002 - 11:15 AM
Hilton San Francisco Franciscan Room B (100)

This presentation is part of EVAL-153. Evaluation Efforts of State Programs: Arizona, California, Hawaii, and New Mexico

A Process Evaluation of New Mexico Youth Empowerment Tobacco Control Programs

Eric F. Chrisp, MA, University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Pediatrics, echrisp@salud.unm.edu, Gilbert Quintero, PhD, Giquintero@salud.unm.edu.

Learning Objectives: Recognize barriers and solutions to developing process evaluations of tobacco programs in frontier environments.

Abstract:
Problem/Objective: A research team from the University of New Mexico Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention is conducting a process evaluation of youth driven tobacco control and prevention programs throughout the state of New Mexico (funded by a grant from the American Legacy Foundation). The objective of this presentation is to explain the process of organizing a Statewide process evaluation in New Mexico, a frontier state characterized by a unique history, low population density, scarce financial resources and a tri-ethnic population. These factors and others present unique challenges to programs forming to combat the influence of tobacco, and to public health researchers conducting evaluations of these programs. Therefore, a process evaluation must be adapted to extant conditions.
Methods: A conceptual framework designed to guide the investigation of Youth Development & Empowerment based programs was developed collaboratively with stakeholders, both youth and adults, through a nominal group process. Empowerment concepts such as those developed by Zimmerman (1995), Wallerstein (1992), Chinman and Linney (1998) Kim et. al (1998) also informed the conceptual framework.
Results: The framework remains flexible enough to incorporate evolving ideas about empowerment and cultural and regional differences. It is serving as a road map to plan, implement, and analyze the process evaluation. Preliminary results will be discussed.

Discussion: Barriers to program implementation and evaluation in a frontier state will be discussed. Together, previous research and local views of youth empowerment can be integrated to make an effective process evaluation. Youth involvement in study development is critical.


Back to Evaluation Efforts of State Programs: Arizona, California, Hawaii, and New Mexico
Back to Evaluation and Surveillance
Back to The 2002 National Conference on Tobacco or Health