Thursday, 11 December 2003
Sheraton Boston Hotel Grand Ballroom (1100)
CESS-81-148

This presentation is part of CESS-81. Poster Session

Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention For Cigarette Smoking

Elias Robles, PhD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, roblessoteloelias@uams.edu, Cynthia Crone, MSc, cronecynthiac@uams.edu, Nicola Conners, PhD, ConnersNicolaA@uams.edu, Leanne Whiteside-Mansell, PhD, WhitesideMansellLeanne@uams.edu, Patti Bokony, PhD, Patti.A.Bokony@fcsmtp.uams.edu, Worley Linda, MD, WorleyLindaL@fcsmtp.uams.edu.

Learning Objectives: Describe the effects of an intense behavioral smoking cessation program in a residential treatment center

Abstract:
Problem/Objective: Assesses the efficacy of an intensive smoking cessation treatment with women (N=20) living with their children in a residential substance abuse treatment facility.
Methods: The study uses an A-B-A individual reversal design, in which a 1-week baseline is followed by 4 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks of follow-up. The intervention consists of exposure to an educational video, advice to quit, group review of a smoking cessation workbook, 4 weekly individual counseling sessions, feedback on breath carbon monoxide (CO) concentration 3 times every weekday, feedback on weekend smoking from Monday morning urine cotinine (COT), and 4-week exposure to an escalating schedule of voucher-based reinforcement of abstinence from smoking. During the abstinence reinforcement intervention, participants receive vouchers of escalating value ($3.00-$10.00) for CO-negative breath samples (<=7 ppm). Positive breath or urine samples reset the voucher value to zero.
Results: To date 10 participants have completed the study, earning $472.75 on the average. In this preliminary data analysis (N=10), repeated measures ANOVA of the mean number of CO and COT-negative tests by treatment phase, indicated significant differences between treatment phases. Post-hoc analysis revealed more CO- and COT-negative tests during the intervention (41.8 %) than during baseline (18.3 %) and follow-up (18.7 %; both p< 0.05).
Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that intensive cognitive-behavioral interventions are efficacious in motivating cigarette smoking cessation in this at-risk population, and that more prolonged interventions may be necessary to sustain abstinence once the reinforcement program is removed.


Back to Poster Session
Back to Cessation, Nicotine, and the Science of Addiction

Back to The 2003 National Conference on Tobacco or Health (December 10-12, 2003)