|
Learning Objectives: Compare efficiencies and quit outcomes of conducting Quitline proactive calls using an IVR system vs. calls carried out by Quitline Specialists.
Methods: The study will be conducted with 4000 smokers seeking assistance from the NYS Quitline between March and July 2007. Eligibility includes “interested in quitting” and “received nicotine patches”. Half will be randomly assigned the IVR callback and half the standard service in which a Quitline specialist attempts to re-contact the client. A random sample in each group will be contacted at 3 months to assess smoking status and utilization of quit methods. We will also compare callback completion rates and cost per completed callback. It is hypothesized that the IVR system will be more cost efficient than standard service without adversely impacting client satisfaction and smoking outcomes.
Results: Accrual begins March 2007 and will be completed July 2007. The study data will be available to present at the Conference in October.
Conclusions: The study results should be of interest to those involved in financing Quitlines as IVR technology can improve the efficiency of services.