2007 National Conference on Tobacco or Health

Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 10:30 AM
Auditorium Room 3

Co-opting the Tobacco Control Movement: Phillips Morris' Extreme Makeover'

Stella Bialous, DrPH RN, Tobacco Policy International, stella@bialous.com, Elizabeth A. Smith, PhD, University of California, San Francisco, Social & Behavioral Sciences, libby.smith@ucsf.edu, Pamela M. Ling, MD MPH, University of California San Francisco, Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, pling@medicine.ucsf.edu, Patricia A. McDaniel, PhD, University of California, San Francisco, Social & Behavioral Sciences, patricia.mcdaniel@ucsf.edu, Ruth E. Malone, PhD RN, University of California, San Francisco, Social & Behavioral Sciences, ruth.malone@ucsf.edu.

Learning Objectives: Describe recent Philip Morris "makeover" strategies Recognize potential industry efforts to "divide and conquer" advocates Assess implications of the makeover for tobacco control strategies

Audience: Tobacco control advocates, researchers, health practitioners and policymakers.

Key Points: Tobacco industry delegitimization has been a key element of effective and comprehensive tobacco control strategies. However, in recent years the most successful tobacco company, Philip Morris/Altria, has initiated multiple efforts to convince policymakers that they have changed. These include changing the name of the company's parent corporation, emphasizing corporate responsibility, admitting risks and offering health guidance on company websites, supporting FDA regulations, claiming they do not want youth to smoke, and reaching out to try to partner with health and other organizations to address youth smoking. This panel discusses what internal company documents show about these “extreme makeover” efforts by Philip Morris, the largest US tobacco company, and how they are part of a systematic, long-term plan intended to undermine tobacco control.

Learning Objectives: At the end of this presentation, participants will identify makeover strategies used by Philip Morris, describe their intended effects on tobacco control, and consider ways to counter them.

Benefits: Through viewing internal tobacco company documents and contextualizing industry activities, advocates and others will identify ways to counter industry makeover messages and erroneous public perceptions that the tobacco industry has “turned over a new leaf.”